Formally The Anderson Shelter...An Around Midnight Publication ©2012-2014.

Friday, April 24, 2015

Minicab driver jailed after picking up woman in Shoreditch and taking her to be raped.

A minicab driver and his friend have been jailed after the driver picked up a woman in Shoreditch, kidnaped her, then took her to a house in E17 where she was raped.

            Salam Mohammed.                          Mohammed Sallah

The minicab tout accepted the fare to take a young woman home, but instead drove her to his friend’s house. Both men were given custodial sentences on Thursday, 23 April at Snaresbrook Crown Court.

Salah Mohammed, 31 (03.05.1983) of Varley Road, E16 had been found guilty of kidnap and encouraging, or assisting the commission of a serious offence, namely rape and jailed for nine years.

His friend, Mohammed Sallah, 38 (01.01.1977) of Hylands Road, E17 had pleaded guilty to rape at an earlier hearing and was jailed for seven years two months.

The court heard how on the night of Friday, 7 March 2014 Salah Mohammed was touting and having his car cleaned at the carwash on Great Eastern Street, EC1. He was approached by the victim’s friend, who asked him to take the victim home. The victim had been drinking and felt unwell. 

He was given £10 for the fare and the victim’s friend took a photograph of the vehicle’s registration plate. The friend also called the victim’s family and said that the victim, a woman in her twenties, was on her way home.

When the victim did not arrive at her home address, her non-appearance was reported to police during the early hours of 8 March. It transpired that instead of taking her home, Mohammed had taken the victim to the home of his friend, Mohammed Sallah ,eight miles away in Walthamstow, where Sallah raped her in his house.

After the rape the victim was taken by Salah Mohammed to Wood Green where she was let out of the car and was able to contact her family and speak to police to report the offence.

Detective Constable Dele Bolude from the Met’s Sexual Offences, Exploitation and Child Abuse Command, said: “This was a despicable crime. I would like to praise the victim’s courage in coming forward and reporting it to police. I hope that this sentence sends a clear message regarding the seriousness of this type of offending and gives other victims of sexual offences the courage to come forward.”

Detective Inspector Simon Giles from the Met’s Sexual Offences, Exploitation and Child Abuse Command, said: “The Met Police is committed to prosecuting sex offenders and working with partners to support victims of crime. The events of March 8 last year have had a devastating effect on the victim but I hope that these convictions will give her some comfort and closure on her road to recovery.” 

Offending Taxi Sign Taken Down, But Nothing To Do With Compliance.

It's been bought to our attention that a long running dispute between Taxi drivers and a certain minicab operator in Victoria Road, Ruislip.

For over 6 years the company, Alfa Cars, has been displaying a sign advertising the companies service in their front window using the word Taxi. As we know this is not allowed under the London Cab Act and the Private Hire Act. 

Complaints have been made direct to TfL by Taxi drivers over the last 6 years which seem to regularly fall on deaf ears.

But we can now report that at last the sign has been taken down. 

Unfortunately this removal was not due to compliance checks or as a result of the numerous complaints. The sign was removed to make way for a new sign which advertises the fact that Alfa Cars now has its own SmartPhone app.

94 Year Old Woman Knocked Down By Minicab, Plus Letter To Editor.

A 94-year-old woman is fighting for her life and her husband is seriously injured after a crash involving a minicab in a busy north London road.

The collision at the junction of West Heath Drive and North End Road, Golders Green, happened at about 4pm. Roads in the area were shut until 7.30pm.

Police initially said the woman was in a serious condition but sadly this evening were forced to downgrade her condition to critical.

One of TfL's finest, taking out a motorcyclist in High Holborn.

            Another one of Hendy's Heroes 

Letter to the Editor:

Dave Davies makes a lot of powerful arguments, and most of his letter I could have written myself. I believe the way forward is to take legal action, against everyone.

The LTDA have a one million pound fighting fund, I am prepared to contribute to that on a regular basis. Let's get some heavyweight legal opinions.

Tfl will have legal obligations and duties which they are clearly failing to discharge. Uber are pursuing all kinds of questionable practices, and sound arguments have been made on this site about rickshaws. If these people are breaking the law,  we can't wait for the cavalry to come riding over the hill. We sue them,  now.

Demos only succeed in making us feel good about ourselves, tfl manipulate the media at these events to suit their own agenda and nothing changes.

We are running out of time.

Boris and his cronies aren't listening to us,  perhaps they'll listen to a judge.

Regards,  Brian Griffith.

A Must Listen From Sean And Iqbal.

Well done Sean and Iqbal 

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Letter To The Editor : St Thomas Street Lights Unacceptable.

This letter from a concerned Taxi driver was sent to Peter John of Southwark Council, CC'ed in were;  AM Valerie Shorcross, AM Caroline Pidgeon and AM Jenny Jones.

Dear Mr John 
I'm emailing you with regard to the curren traffic situation at St Thomas Street and the Shard. I'm a London Taxi Driver and use the Shard regularly to acquire work and also to drop off customers. The current situation in regards to exiting St Thomas St is becoming nothing short of embarrassing. 

For one of Europe's biggest landmarks and one of London's most popular social locations, the access to and from is nothing short of third world due to the incompetence of whoever is in charge of the traffic management orders in and out of St Thomas St.

On exiting St Thomas St the current traffic management order (TMO), is a very short phase, only allowing 2 to 3 vehicles out at a time. The light phase is also a forced left only. This means all vehicles exiting are forced left down Borough High St. Any vehicle needing to travel north has to turn left, then make a u-turn in very heavy traffic to be able to travel north. 

At the junction of St Thomas St, Borough high St and Bedale St, it would make perfect sense to implement a longer phase, have the ability to exit St Thomas St left (south bound), forward (west bound), and right (north bound), and finally to implement a yellow box junction to stop traffic travelling south bound along Borough High St from blocking the access to and from St Thomas St. 

Cars are allowed to park on a red route in bays that are given designated parking times. The trouble with this is that large vehicles such as buses (of which there are a large number that use Borough High St), are unable to move freely north and south. One lot of traffic has to give way to the other. 

Over a short space of time this causes the traffic to back up and become congested all the way back to Borough Station in the south and up to the south side of London Bridge itself in the north (this traffic stops of the exit of St Thomas St. 

There desperately needs to be some severe enforcement of the cars parked on Borough High St. Removing the bays and/or changing the times allowed to park there and also enforcing the area with wardens would keep traffic flowing freely, congestion to be reduced and pollution levels to drop.

The other issue we have as Taxi Drivers is that it's not uncommon for a large fare to be accrued before I've exited St Thomas St. 

Some nights the queue to exit is all the way back to the Shard itself. I find myself having to explain to customers that it will take time and money to even begin their journey. It's embarrassing and unnecessary. Just last night (28/03/15), I had £7.20 on the meter before I managed to exit St Thomas St. 

This is unacceptable to my customers. 
The flag fall when i start the meter is £2.40. 
If traffic was free flowing, I'd expect no more than £3.00 on the meter by the time I exited St Thomas St. I have heard of cabbies having £13+ before when it's really bad. 

There are also stories of customers getting out of cabs when queuing to exit. Again this is unacceptable to the cabbie when he or she has ranked for a long time only to then be left in static traffic with no fare on board.

Lastly, the Private Hire Vehicles (minicabs) that park along Borough High St at the bottle neck, are acting illegally and touting for work. This needs enforcing too. TfL have just allegedly acquired more members of their Compliance Officers team. Is it possible to liaise with TfL in order to address this problem. This does affect the Shard too when minicabs rank illegally for work outside. I know Addison Lee has an account at the Shard, I'm talking about any other PHV.

I appreciate you reading about these issues. Unfortunately they affect every vehicle that accesses the Shard. Europe's tallest building built on a dead end road with atrocious access. Not a very good advertisement. The guests are shown London traffic at it's worst. 

I'm not so sure this gives a very good impression? Transport for London are responsible mainly for these matters. Unfortunately, they hide in their Ivory tower on Blackfriars Road and won't be held accountable for their wholly inadequate way in which they run London's roads. This is why I'm contacting you all in a slim hope that someone can help.

Thank you for your time. I look forward to your responses and some action. 

P Crane. 

Response from Peter John (Southwark Council)
Thanks for your email Peter. I have taken it up with our transport team and will see what progress we can make. I know that this is an issue which will (and has already) caused concern for the owners of the Shard. 
I will get back to you as soon as I have any further information. 


The letter was also forwarded on by the GLA members to TfL as St Thomas Street is a Red Rout and comes under the authority of TfL's Red Rout Network.

Response From: Hatch Andrew []
Sent: 14 April 2015 14:05
To: Valerie Shawcross
Cc: Members Correspondence; Keane Kate; Johnson Esther (Correspondence) Subject: REPLY: St Thomas Street and traffic management issues. 

Dear Val
Thank you for your email. 
As you may know, to accommodate the redevelopment at London Bridge station, St Thomas Street is currently closed in one direction at its junction with Borough High Street until 2018. 

The traffic signal timings at this junction have been set to give priority to traffic travelling north and southbound along Borough High Street and work in conjunction with surrounding signalised junctions to keep this key route flowing. The signal timings also have to be programmed to ensure that the bus services, which carry a significant number of people throughout the day, can run as effectively as possible. 

That said, we have reviewed the signal timings at the junction and have been able to increase the green time available to traffic exiting St Thomas Street very slightly (in the late evening period after 20:30) to accommodate the number of taxis dropping off and picking up customers from The Shard. Please be assured that due to the high number of works and developments, and associated changes to the road network (both temporary and permanent), our traffic engineers keep all the signal junctions in the London Bridge area under close review. 

Mr Crane suggests implementing an option for a right turn and straight ahead movement out of St Thomas Street. Unfortunately, this is not possible. To include this additional stage in the traffic signal cycle would require an increase in the cycle time. This would result in all traffic and pedestrian movements having to wait longer for their respective green signal, and creating significant delays on the north and southbound movements along Borough High Street. 

We have a scheme proposed to improve facilities for the high numbers of pedestrians and cyclists using this junction. A diagonal crossing across Borough High Street, and advanced stop lines for cyclists are expected to be introduced in the coming year. It would not be possible to install a yellow box junction alongside these improvements, but “Keep Clear” road markings may be possible and we have committed to look at this possibility within the scheme’s scope.

Mr Crane also refers to stopping and parking along Borough High Street. I can confirm that disabled parking and loading bays operate Monday to Saturday 13:00 to 16:00 (northbound) and 10:00 to 13:00 (southbound). CCTV enforces illegal parking between Queens Head Yard and Southwark Cathedral, and Marshalsea Road and Mermaid Court. These restrictions are actively enforced to minimise instances of illegal use, but as this on-street parking is used by local businesses and their customers, any amendments including removal or amendments to timings or positions would require public consultation and the revision of the Traffic Regulation Order. We have committed to considering increased on-street enforcement in due course. 

Finally, in terms of the matter raised about Private Hire vehicles in the area, we are aware of the touting and our Compliance Team will address this issue. We are also considering a change from single red lines to double red lines to attempt to address this issue. Please note however that this is subject to further investigation, public consultation and the making of a Traffic Regulation Order. 
I hope this is helpful.

Kind regards
Andrew Hatch 
Correspondence Officer Managing Director's Office 
Transport for London - Surface Transport 
11F - Zone R3 - Palestra - 197 Blackfriars Road - London - SE1 8NJ. 

Worse Case Of Uber Fraud So Far...Woman Charged $2,200 A Mile

An Uber customer was hit with a huge $16,000 bill for her 7-mile nightmare journey across New York.

Jaime Hessel said her driver had been on his phone, cut across lanes, and even driven down a bus lane during the 35 minute 'trip from hell' from her East Williamsburg apartment to Midtown East.

So she was stunned to receive a message from the cab-hailing app telling her she owed them thousands of dollars for the trip across boroughs.

Horrified: Jaimie Hessel says Uber billed her $16,000 for a 35-minute 'car ride from hell' - and says she's never going to trust the cab-hailing service again

The journey began on March 28 when Ms Hessel decided to call an UberX car to get to a fundraising pub crawl for cancer due to start at 1pm.

But alarms bells were triggered as soon as she got in the car to find the driver appeared distracted. 

After sitting in the vehicle for around five minutes before setting off, he soon began to ignore the GPS, taking a longer and more complicated route, according to Ms Hessel.

To the passenger's terror, instead of paying his full attention to the road, the driver was also taking phone calls and checking his voicemail during the trip.

Ms Hessel claims that the car dangerously cut across lanes of traffic on several occasions and was even driven down a bus lane until she demanded to be let out early.

'I had him drop me off a block away from the bar because I didn't want to be in the car anymore. I felt very unsafe.'

But the nightmare trip was far from over. 

After receiving her initial bill of $56.40, the passenger immediate e-mailed Uber Support to complain she had been overcharged and that the driver had unnecessarily extended the ride.

Within a few days, the Uber resp had written back to inform Ms Hessel the company agreed the journey was 'inefficient' and she would get a refund of $15.

But the following morning, she received a bizarre email which stated she owed Uber more than $16,000 - with a refund of $4,000. Her total, in the end, came to $12,251.49.

'It freaked me out,' she said 'I have bad eye sight and I thought maybe I wasn't reading it correctly.'

The panicked Ms Hessel quickly got in touch with the company again to inform them of their error and said she felt lucky that her credit card had expired between the journey and the bill so the transport app would have been unable to charge her.

Uber has since wiped the bill and offered to pay her the original $15 refund but Ms Hessel said she now feels she can't trust them with her new card details.

They say it was a clerical error and that she was never actually charged the $16,000. 

She added it was unlikely she would ever use the app again. 

    Source : The Gothemist.